USPTO serial 76572455
SPEEDY FUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEEDY FUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Valley Village, CA
Valley Village, CA
Valley Village, CA
Valley Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Petro
JOSEPH A PETRO WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO & SCHULMAN11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD 9TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail distributorships featuring gasoline and petroleum via gas stations and truck stops | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Termendzhyan, Levon
- Other trademarks owned by Termendzhyan, Levon
- Other trademarks owned by Termendjian, Grigor
- Other trademarks owned by Termendjian, Grigor
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SPEEDY FUEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |