Drawing for SIRENS OF TI

USPTO serial 76572525

SIRENS OF TI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIRENS OF TI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARRIE E. PETERMAN

JASON D FIRTH ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, watches, clocks and lapel pinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 14, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 14, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance