USPTO serial 76572714
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $2,600
DE-58640 Iserlohn, DE
Iserlohn, 5860, DE
Iserlohn, 5860, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Jones
Jason Jones Thorpe North & Western, LLP8180 S. 700 E., Suite 350Sandy, UT 84070United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | INSTALLATION SYSTEMS MADE PRIMARILY OF METAL AND USED FOR CERAMIC AND STONE TILES, NAMELY, EDGE PROTECTION AND TRANSITION PROFILES FOR FLOORS AND WALLS, STAIR NOSING PROFILES, MOVEMENT AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR FLOORS AND WALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | HEATING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, RADIANT HEATING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF PIPES, MANIFOLDS, VALVES AND CONTROLS SOLD AS A UNIT; NON-METAL SHOWER SYSTEM COMPRISED OF SHOWER TRAYS, SHOWER RAMPS, SHOWER RECEPTORS, SHOWER CURBS, FLOOR DRAINS, AND NON-METAL EXTERIOR SYSTEMS FOR BALCONIES AND TERRACES COMPRISED OF PROFILES FOR FLOORS AND WALLS; SHOWER SYSTEMS MADE PRIMARILY OF METAL COMPRISED OF SHOWER TRAYS, SHOWER RAMPS, SHOWER RECEPTORS, SHOWER CURBS, FLOOR DRAINS, WATERPROOFING STRIPS, AND EXTERIOR SYSTEMS MADE PRIMARILY OF METAL FOR BALCONIES AND TERRACES COMPRISED OF PROFILES FOR FLOORS AND WALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | WATERPROOFING, UNCOUPLING AND DRAINAGE MEMBRANES | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | NON-METAL INSTALLATION SYSTEMS USED FOR CERAMIC AND STONE TILES, NAMELY, EDGE PROTECTION AND TRANSITION PROFILES FOR FLOORS AND WALLS, STAIR NOSING PROFILES, MOVEMENT AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR FLOORS AND WALLS; COMPOSITE TILE FLOORING ASSEMBLY COMPRISED OF MODULAR SCREENED SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 19, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |