USPTO serial 76572772
ENVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3151282Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sturgeon Bay, WI
Sturgeon Bay, WI
Sturgeon Bay, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
ENVI LLC253 N 1ST AVENUESTURGEON BAY, WI 54235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL SHOP-AT-HOME PARTY SERVICES FEATURING JEWELRY AND ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING JEWELRY | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2012 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |