USPTO serial 76572958
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Musselburgh, EH21 8RD, Scotland, GB
Musselburgh, EH21 8RD, Scotland, GB
Musselburgh, EH21 8RD, Scotland, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet F Satterthwaite
JANET F SATTERTHWAITE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWNW, WA 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motorcycles and structural parts therefore | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | motorcycle repair and maintenance services; advisory services relating to the repair and maintenance of motorcycles; installation of parts and accessories for motorcycles; motorcycle cleaning and detailing services; garage services for motorcycle repair and maintenance; painting refurbishment of motorcycles; customization and modification of motorcycles; reconditioning and repair of motorcycle engines, gearboxes, transaxles and suspension components; information services relating to the foregoing services provided in person, in literature, and over the Internet or via a computer database, all relating to motorcycles and motorcycle parts not including any goods or services relating to leather and imitations of leather and goods made of these materials, namely, bags, luggage, cases, including toiletry cases, travelling cases and closely related accessories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |