Drawing for TIRE AMERICA

USPTO serial 76572984

TIRE AMERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIRE AMERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Baxley

CHARLES E BAXLEY HART BAXLEY DANIELS & HOLTON90 JOHN ST STE 309NEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail outlets featuring tires from many countries of origin for passenger and commercial automobile vehiclesACTIVEFeb 15, 2004
037Passenger and commercial automobile vehicle repair and maintenance services on vehicles from many countries of origin, namely wheel alignment, wheel balancing and tire mountingACTIVEFeb 15, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2005AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Mar 28, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance