USPTO serial 76573063
LOYALTY BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3493050Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOYALTY BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Midvale, UT
Midvale, UT
Midvale, UT
RENO, NV
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LOYALTY CENTRAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named LOYALTY BY DESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |