USPTO serial 76573102
SOLID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Shereen Zamaludin
LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP3000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Real estate development and planning services, namely developing, laying out, and constructing residential communities and individual residences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |