USPTO serial 76573133
CUP O' JOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUP O' JOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick P. Phillips
PATRICK P PHILLIPS KREMBLAS, FOSTER, PHILLIPS & POLLICK7632 SLATE RIDGE BLVDREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | COFFEE MUGS, HAND-OPERATED COFFEE GRINDERS, COFFEE BRUSHES, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE PERCOLATORS, NON-ELECTRIC ESPRESSO MACHINES, METAL FILTERS FOR COFFEE BREWING, THERMAL INSULATED CONTAINERS FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES, TEAPOTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, NON-ELECTRIC FRENCH COFFEE PRESSES, CANISTER SETS AND PITCHERS | ACTIVE | Dec 28, 1993 |
| 030 | ESPRESSO, COFFEE DRINKS, COCOA, COFFEE BEANS, TEAS, MUFFINS, CROISSANTS, COOKIES, SCONES, CINNAMON ROLLS, PECAN ROLLS, BROWNIES, BAGELS, BISCOTTI, CHOCOLATE CANDIES AND WHEATBASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | Dec 28, 1993 |
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES, CATERING SERVICES, AND RETAIL AND WHOLESALE SHOPS FEATURING COFFEE, COFFEE ACCESSORIES, AND RELATED PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | Dec 28, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |