Drawing for BL

USPTO serial 76573265

BL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machine part, namely, a ball bearing used as part of a machine on which another part turns or slidesACTIVEFeb 11, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 8, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 8, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 21, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance