USPTO serial 76573343
SEMINIS INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3240200Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEMINIS INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIET L. REAM
BRANDI SIMPSON SEMINIS VEGETABLE SEEDS INC2700 CAMINO DEL SOLLEGAL DEPTOXNARD, CA 93030-7967Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit in cut and sliced form; Fruit in bottled, candied, canned, cooked, crystallized, dried, frozen, glazed, processed and preserved form; Candied fruit snacks; Fruit chips; Fruit conserves; Fruit leathers; Fruit paste, Fruit pectin; Fruit peels; Fruit preserves; Fruit pulps; Fruit rinds; Fruit salads; Fruit-based spreads; Jellies; Jams; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Vegetables in bottled, candied, canned, cooked, dried, frozen, glazed, pickled, grilled, processed and preserved form; Frozen, packaged and prepared entrees, all consisting primarily of vegetables; Cole slaw; Garden salads; Frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; Pickles; Vegetables in cut and sliced form; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Processed pimientos; Soups; Stews; Vegetable paste; Vegetable salad; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetable-based food beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Raw and unprocessed fruits and vegetables; Raw herbs; Fresh herbs; Unprocessed herbs; Agricultural seeds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named SEMINIS INNOVATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |