USPTO serial 76573434
CRITTERS FOR COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRITTERS FOR COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
James E. Shlesinger SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP1420 KING STREET, SUITE 600ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's books | ACTIVE | Jul 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |