USPTO serial 76573437
VEG-EMART FROM FIELD TO FRESH.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEG-EMART FROM FIELD TO FRESH.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grande Pointe, Ontario, CA
Grande Pointe, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
L S VAN LANDINGHAM III12921 BRIDGER DRGERMANTOWN, MD 20874UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable produce and related food and beverage products, namely, frozen vegetables, frozen legumes, frozen fruits, cheese, milk and milk beverages with high milk content | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | vegetable produce and related food and beverage products, namely, fresh vegetables, fresh legumes and fresh fruits | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | vegetable produce and related food and beverage products, namely, non-alcoholic fruit drinks and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | marketing of vegetable produce and related food and beverage products, namely, promoting the sale of the goods by arranging for sponsors to affiliate the goods with agricultural, entertainment or sports events, by the use of discount cards, by the administration of incentive award programs, by awarding purchase points through the use of credit cards, by the distribution of printed material and promotional contests; conducting market analyses and market research in the field of vegetable produce and related food and beverage products on behalf of producers, distributors, food services companies and retailers; wholesale distributorships featuring vegetable produce and related food and beverage products; retail store and online retail store services in the field of vegetable produce and related food and beverage products; and business management services in the nature of coordinating agricultural business activities between producers, distributors, food services companies and retailers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FARMETRIX INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FARMETRIX INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VEG-EMART FROM FIELD TO FRESH.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |