Drawing for MORLEY WINERY

USPTO serial 76573603

MORLEY WINERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3091658Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 9, 2006
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORLEY WINERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norris D. Wolff

MORLEY HOLDINGS, LLCc/o Eric M. Flanagan675 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033winesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 6, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 10, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 9, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 17, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 9, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2005CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance