Drawing for SHERE KHAN

USPTO serial 76573741

SHERE KHAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHERE KHAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet E. Perkins

HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPONE LOGAN SQ STE 180018TH & CHERRY STSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared meals incorporating meat, fish, poultry, game, meat extracts and/or preserved, dried, cooked fruits and vegetables; meat; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; eggs; milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; condiments, namely, pepper oil; edible oils and fats.ACTIVE—
030Rice; sauces; condiments, namely curry; curry sauce; spices; relishes; food flavorings; seasonings; processed herbs; herb-sauces; prepared meals incorporating rice, sauces, condiments, spices, relishes, flavorings, seasonings, herbs, herb-sauces and preparations made from cereals.ACTIVE—
043Restaurants; preparation of food and drink; serving of food and drink; bar and cocktail lounge services; providing banquet facilities for special occassions; information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance