USPTO serial 76573965
ICON ADVISERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICON ADVISERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenwood Village, CO
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Birney
Thomas S. Birney Dorr, Carson & Birney, P.C.501 South Cherry Street, Suite 800Denver, CO 80246UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely management of investment funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ICON Advisers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ICON ADVISERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ICON ADVISERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ICON ADVISERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |