Drawing for AUDIOTECHNIK DIETZ

USPTO serial 76574093

AUDIOTECHNIK DIETZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOTECHNIK DIETZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Schwaab

RICHARD L SCHWAAB FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500, 3000 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) CAN BUS interfaces and multimedia interfaces in the nature of hardware and software adapters that connect and ensure compatibility between car radios and remote controls for car radios, between external audio/video sources and between car data bus systems and radios or navigation systems; (Based on 44(e)) Hi-fl and car radio accessories, namely, electrical wires, electrical plugs, plug connectors, fuses, fuse boxes, adapters, electrical power distributor blocks, suppression filters, condensers, radiosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 7, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance