USPTO serial 76574296
THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, strainers, turners, sieves, graters, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, basting spoons, ice cream scoops, serving forks, forks for barbecuing, mixing spoons, serving spoons, slotted spoons, cooking skewers, rolling pins; scrubbing combs, sponges and brushes, glass fabrics for industrial use; polished plate glass, ceramic, glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, bowls, plates, dishes, canister sets, coffee cups, canteens, carafes, carving boards, gravy boats, ice buckets, meal trays, serving trays not of precious metal; lunchboxes, colanders, plates, cups, electric and non-electric toothbrushes, bottles sold empty, bottle openers, mugs; glass storage jugs, drinking glasses, shot glasses, glass storage jars, spice racks, beverage glassware, beverage stirrers, demitasse sets consisting of cups and saucers, sugar and creamer sets featuring sugar bowls not of precious metal and creamer pitchers, coffee pots not of precious metal, plant and flower baskets; wicker, straw, wood and cloth baskets; plastic buckets, woven fabric buckets, tea caddies, tea sets; cookery molds, pots and pans; cookie sheets; serving utensils, namely, ladles, cake servers, pie servers, tongs; coasters not of paper and not table linen, cocktail shakers, cookie cutters, cork screws, corn cob holders, decanters, flasks, plastic household gloves for general use, dinnerware, containers for household use, all purpose portable household containers, containers for household use, namely, globes, baby bath tubs, back scratchers, bakeware, baking dishes; barware, namely, corkscrews, wine bottle foil cutters, wine glasses, carafes, decanters, wine racks, coolers for wine and champagne, plastic bottle stoppers and pourers, bottle openers, measuring jiggers, crumb scrapers, flasks, cork extractors, champagne openers, stainless steel cocktail sets comprised of cocktail picks and shakers sold together as a unit, seltzer bottles, high ball glasses and wine goblets; bird baths not being structures, bird feeders, bird houses; crystal, china, earthenware, glass, porcelain and terra cotta busts; candlesticks not of precious metal, ceramic figurines, cleaning cloths, clothes pins, paper towel dispensers, soap dispensers, foam drink holders, hair brushes, hair combs, ceramic and porcelain holiday ornaments excluding Christmas tree ornaments, incense burners, napkin holders, napkin rings not of precious metal, ornamental glass spheres, paper cups and plates, plastic cups and plates, pepper grinders and mills, portable coolers, potties for children, recipe boxes, salt and pepper shakers, shoe horns, shoe trees, toilet paper holders, toothpicks, toothpick holders, trash cans, towel bars and holders, urns, watering cans, all of the foregoing goods not made of precious metal; consumer cosmetics brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PBIC | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |