USPTO serial 76574299
THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
Lisa W. Rosaya BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, COMPOTES; EGGS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS, namely, half and half, milk based beverages containing fruits and fruit juice, milk beverages with high milk content, milk drinks containing fruits, milk powder, milk-based beverage containing coffee, powdered milk for food purposes, soy milk, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, cottage cheese, sour cream, cheeses, butters, egg nog, cream, margarine, crème fraiche, yogurt, yogurt drinks, curd, flavoring syrups and liquid and powdered beverage mixes used to make milk-based food beverages, dairy-based food beverages and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; FLOUR AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, BREAD, PASTRY AND CONFECTIONERY products, namely, chocolates and candies, cookies, fudge, chewing gum, chocolated nuts, chocolate biscuits, frozen confections, freezable liquid for use in making frozen confections, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream mixes and powders, icing, ice cream substitute, ice-cream cakes, pralines, nougat, marzipan, candy bars, chocolate chips, chocolate truffles, pies, cakes, cream buns and cream puffs; ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING-POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD; VINEGAR, SAUCES, CONDIMENTS, namely, ketchup, mayonnaise, relishes, salsas, marinades, glazes, chocolate syrup and pepper; SPICES; ICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, namely, soft drinks, drinking waters, flavored waters, energy drinks, sports drinks, coffee, coffee-based and coffee-flavored beverages, tea, tea-based and tea-flavored beverages, tea beverages flavored with fruit juice, frozen coffee and coffee-flavored beverages; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; SYRUPS, concentrates, powders, non-alcoholic fruit extracts AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES in the nature of fruit drinks, fruit juices, lemonades, soft drinks, fruit drinks, flavored waters, mineral and aerated waters, energy drinks, sports drinks, coffee-based beverages, tea-based beverages, tea beverages flavored with fruit juice, non-alcoholic bottled coffee beverages and coffee flavored beverages, frozen non-alcoholic coffee and coffee-flavored beverages and non-alcoholic bottled tea beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C.S. Lewis (PTE.) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by C.S. Lewis (PTE.) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |