USPTO serial 76574330
REAL TIME EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REAL TIME EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
Gregory N. Owen Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C.455 Market Street, Suite 1910San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CELLULAR MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHING EQUIPMENT COMPRISED OF HIGH-SPEED PACKET SWITCHES AND SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY, MESSAGE ROUTING AND DISTRIBUTION WITHIN WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; CUSTOMER, LOCATION AND EQUIPMENT REGISTERS; PACKET DATA SWITCHES AND GATEWAYS; OPERATIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMER SERVICE AND TRANSFERRING CALL RECORDS AND BILLING INFORMATION; NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR TRACKING ALL NETWORK TRANSACTIONS AND SENDING NETWORK ALARMS; WIRELESS CUSTOMER TERMINAL SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING WIRELESS SERVICES IN MOBILE TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND PORTABLE COMPUTERS; GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TERMINALS AND APPLIANCES, NAMELY, TELEPHONES, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, TWO-WAY RADIOS, [ HUBS, ] ROUTERS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, SWITCHES, GATEWAYS, TRANSCEIVERS, REPEATERS, MODEMS, PROCESSORS, COMPRESSORS, MULTIPLEXERS, BRIDGES, [ NODES, ] SERVERS, FIREWALLS FOR INTERCONNECTING AND INTERFACING WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC HANDLING AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE, NETWORK TERMINALS AND APPLIANCES, NAMELY, [ HUBS, ] ROUTERS, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, SWITCHES, GATEWAYS, [ TRANSCEIVERS, REPEATERS, ] MODEMS, PROCESSORS, [ COMPRESSORS, ] MULTIPLEXERS, BRIDGES, [ NODES, ] SERVERS, FIREWALLS FOR CACHING, COMPRESSION, MULTIPLEXING, PROTOCOL CONVERSION, LOAD BALANCING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TELEPHONY, VOICE, COMPUTER AND DATA NETWORKING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ROUTERS, GATEWAYS, BRIDGES, HUBS, NODES, SERVERS, FIREWALLS; TEST EQUIPMENT AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING, MEASURING AND OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS; SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING ALL OF THE ABOVE GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |