USPTO serial 76574652
Serial No. 76574652
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76574652?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Torrance, CA
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for management and tracking of patient information and medical records; prerecorded videotapes and DVDs featuring medical and patient information relating to kidney disease, and hemodialysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, newsletters, periodicals, informational brochures and magazines in the field of kidney disease and dialysis; training and education materials relating to hemodialysis, namely, printed manuals, printed workbooks, and prerecorded video tapes and DVDs sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Management of healthcare clinics and dialysis facilities for others; recruitment and placement of medical personnel for others; business services, namely, operation of dialysis facilities and healthcare clinics and management of dialysis facilities and healthcare clinics; consultation services, namely, cost analysis services in the medical field; business management of medical practices and offices for other | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Administration of renal health care services plans for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Patient education and training services, namely, one-on-one counseling, seminars, classes, conferences, and workshops in the field of kidney disease and hemodialysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials; product development for others in the following medical fields; renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, dermatology, infectious disease, obtetrics, gynecology, and neurology; diagnostic medical laboratory services; maintenance, updating, and installation of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Renal health care services; renal-related physician services; telephone information services in the field of reporting and tracking renal patient care; renal therapy and surgical services; medical blood testing services; medical services in the nature of renal disease management services; providing medical and patient information relating to kidney disease and hemodialysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Davita Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Davita Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |