USPTO serial 76574693
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
KALAMAZOO, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. PATRICK SAGE
G. PATRICK SAGE HUESCHEN & SAGE PLLC107 WEST MICHIGAN AVENUESEVENTH FLOOR, KALAMAZOO BUILDINGKALAMAZOO, MI 49007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sportswear, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, shirts, hats, pants, and shorts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |