USPTO serial 76574829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Chapple
SCOTT A CHAPPLE DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC29 W LAWRENCE ST STE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Building materials, namely, fencing or railing including lumber such as panels, boards, wood boards, synthetic boards, composite boards, extruded boards, molded boards or rails, posts, acoustic fencing or railing materials, deck railing, porch railing, hot tub railing, patio railing; fasteners and fastening systems; and fencing or railing accessories including decorative trim and decorative finish | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |