USPTO serial 76574853
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III
EDMUND J FERDINAND III GRIMES & BATTERSBY488 MAIN AVE 3RD FLNORWALK, CT 06851UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services; financial services, namely, financial analysis and consultation, financial services in the field of money lending, money lending, investment fund transfer and transaction services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |