USPTO serial 76574941
MICHELLE ELIZABETH GLEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3455884Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICHELLE ELIZABETH GLEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Kendall
JOHN S KENDALL ESQ DAVIS & KENDALL PC27 N WACKER DR STE 528CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Spiritual Books, Self-help Books, Children's Books, Non-Fictional Books and Books of General Interest for Men and Women; and Fictional Books and Books of General Interest for Men and Women | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |