Drawing for UNIQUE YOUNG

USPTO serial 76574974

UNIQUE YOUNG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UNIQUE YOUNG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter N. Lalos

PETER N LALOS STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal storage silosACTIVEApr 22, 1993
007machinery and other equipment for handling, processing and transporting bulk particulate materials, namely dust collector systems comprising dust collectors, pneumatic conveying lines and product collectors; gravity blender systems comprising gravity blenders, pneumatic conveying lines and product collectors; blow tank systems comprising blow tanks, pneumatic conveying lines and product collectors; unloading systems comprising pneumatic conveying lines and filters; dust collectors, centrifugal blowers, mechanical conveyors, blow tanks, cyclone collectors, product receivers, rotary valves, diverter valves, mixers, blenders, bag compactors, machine parts, namely filters for dust control, hoppers, pneumatic conveying systems comprising conveyor ducts, elbows, couplings, unloading adapters, butterfly valves; particle size reduction machines, namely attrition mills, knife cutters and crushers, sifters and screeners for classifying and separating particulate materials, elliptical action screenersACTIVEApr 22, 1993
011dust control units for industrial use, comprising filters, collectors, receivers and bag compactorsACTIVEApr 22, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance