USPTO serial 76575174
NIAGARA FALLSVIEW CASINO RESORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3681643Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NIAGARA FALLSVIEW CASINO RESORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn J. Alstadt
Lynn J. Alstadt BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC501 GRANT STREETSuite 200PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-4413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Organization of trade shows and industry expositions in all industries; retail store services, featuring general merchandise including novelty items, food and clothing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | [ Shopping center services, namely, rental of shopping center space ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances by musical individuals and groups, variety individuals and groups, dance individuals and groups, and comedy individuals and groups; entertainment in the nature of circuses; entertainment in the nature of boxing contests and other competitions in the field of athletics; entertainment in the nature of fashion shows; casinos; lottery services; gaming services, namely, conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring casino and gaming contests and tournaments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Resort hotels, spa services, namely, providing temporary accommodations or meals to clients of a health or beauty spa; restaurants; hotels; operation of a convention centre, namely, providing convention facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named NIAGARA FALLSVIEW CASINO RESORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |