Drawing for CIRCUIT LIGHT

USPTO serial 76575352

CIRCUIT LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRCUIT LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John K. McCulloch

JOHN K MCCULLOCH WARN, BURGESS, HOFFMANN & MCCULLOCH5291 COLONY DR N 1ST FLSAGINAW, MI 48603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011electrical time-controlled signal lights for use with exercise programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2006PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Aug 29, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 31, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance