USPTO serial 76575634
FRESH & FABULOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3643909Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESH & FABULOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CULVER CITY, CA
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Fairbairn
DAVID R FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE PA312 S 3RD STTHE KINNEY & LANGE BLDGMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FEMININE HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FEMININE DEODORANT SPRAYS, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY WASHES, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY SPRAYS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, SKIN TONICS AND EAU DE TOILETTES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | FEMININE HYGIENE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, VAGINAL WASHES AND VAGINAL MOISTURIZERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWEETSPOT LABS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Intimate Grooming Escensuals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named FRESH & FABULOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |