Drawing for DEUCE

USPTO serial 76575958

DEUCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEUCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald F. Frei

DONALD F FREI WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's clothing, namely, suits, blazers, tailored slacks, all weather coats, ties, dress shirts, topcoats, overcoats, shirts, slacks; shirt and slack sets; and suit separates, namely, jackets, pants and vests; sport coatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 3, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance