USPTO serial 76575968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE R. REMAKLUS
THEODORE R REMAKLUS WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Wooden trunks; storage trunks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Candle jars; planters for flowers and plants; decorative wooden vases and bowls; metal kitchen accessories, namely, wine racks, wine bottle cradles; paper towel holders and dispensers, wine buckets, ice buckets, tea services not of precious metal, flower baskets, wicker baskets, plastic baskets, wood baskets, and cloth baskets; beverage ware; serve ware, namely, serving platters, serving bowls, cake servers, pie servers, cake stands, pie stands, casserole dishes, salad bowls, serving spoons, and pitchers; dinnerware, namely, plates, mugs, soup and cereal bowls | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Linens, namely, table cloths, towels, bed sheets, comforters, bedspreads, pillowcases, and bed blankets; window treatments, namely, curtains, panels and valances made of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |