USPTO serial 76576017
KIDPANIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDPANIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Garden City Park, NY
EAST NORTHPORT, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | CHILDREN'S BOOKS | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |