Drawing for UNA TRADICIÓN REFRESCANTE

USPTO serial 76576032

UNA TRADICIÓN REFRESCANTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNA TRADICIÓN REFRESCANTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna Erenburg

ANNA ERENBURG GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032(Based on Intent to Use) FRUIT DRINKS; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE FLAVORED DRINKS; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICES (Based on Use in Commerce) FRUIT-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS AND SODAS; FLAVORED WATER; DRINKING WATER; ENERGY DRINKSACTIVEAug 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance