Drawing for GUMBRUSH

USPTO serial 76576146

GUMBRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUMBRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Modified toothbrush, toothpastes for gums, and all toothbrushes developed for gum useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 3, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 6, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance