USPTO serial 76576295
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
92100 Boulogne, FR
92100 Boulogne, FR
BOULOGNE BILLANCOURT, FR
92100 Boulogne, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Patrick Sage
G. Patrick Sage HUESCHEN & SAGE PLLC107 WEST MICHIGAN AVENUESEVENTH FLOOR, KALAMAZOO BUILDINGKALAMAZOO, MI 49007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | [ Beautician training services; arranging and conducting educational conferences in the fields of medicine and cosmetology ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Conducting research for others in the medical and cosmetic fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing health and medical information services; chemical and pharmaceutical laboratories; consultation services in the fields of health, beauty services, medical and rehabilitation; health care services; medical services, namely, balneology; rental of medical equipment useful for the care and medical assistance at one's private house; physical therapy; physical rehabilitation services; health care services offered in convalescent home; beauty salons; convalescent homes and health spas, namely cosmetic body care services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 10, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 29, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |