USPTO serial 76576374
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
Brampton, Ontario L4W 4T5, CA
Other trademarks owned by Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
Brampton, Ontario L4W 4T5, CA
Other trademarks owned by Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
Brampton, Ontario L4W 4T5, CA
Other trademarks owned by Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY PERVANAS
JEFFREY PERVANAS RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP2 BLOOR ST ESTE 1800TORONTO, ON M4W 3J5| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | milling machines, namely rolling mills for rolling, reducing and finishing metal and alloys; milling machines, namely, rolling mills for rolling metal; milling machines, namely, rolling mills for reducing metal; milling machines, namely rolling mills for finishing metal; milling machines, namely, rolling mills for rolling alloys; milling machines, namely, rolling mills for reducing alloys; milling machines, namely rolling mills for finishing alloys | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1968 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |