USPTO serial 76576391
POWERSPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3427261Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2008
- Examiner
- HETU, JENNIFER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POWERSPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dina B. Ross
Dina B. Ross Dina B. Ross Law Offices1011 W. Lake St.Suite 412Oak Park, IL 60301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication equipment, namely, span powering hardware deployed in central provider offices or remote terminals to enable broadband communications without tethers to the commercial power grid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Westell Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westell Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Westell Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named POWERSPAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |