Drawing for DIGITALBOOK

USPTO serial 76576594

DIGITALBOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITALBOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICES OF JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Binders and binding systems comprised of hinged clips, coordinated plastic or rigid pages for holding media tapes or discs, and stacked leaf-like trays for holding media tapes, discs, documents, small objects, and plastic or rigid disc holdersACTIVEJan 5, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 29, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 24, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 24, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 25, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 19, 2007CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2006CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 17, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 17, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance