USPTO serial 76576611
MIST KIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIST KIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Baldwin
Timothy J. Baldwin Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & HossPO Box 2510Salinas, CA 93902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH VEGETABLES | ABANDONED | Jun 30, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA ARTICHOKE & VEGETABLE GROWERS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA ARTICHOKE & VEGETABLE GROWERS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named MIST KIST
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |