USPTO serial 76576829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SUNDANCE REHABILITATION CORPORATION
IRVINE, CA
Other trademarks owned by SUNDANCE REHABILITATION CORPORATION
BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
Sarasota, FL
Other trademarks owned by BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
Sarasota, FL
Other trademarks owned by BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
Sarasota, FL
Other trademarks owned by BEST Dysphagia Management Services, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Bialek
Adam Bialek Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP150 East 42nd Streetnew york, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Dysphagia management and diagnosis using the endoscopic swallowing test; and healthcare services, namely, providing a dietary management program to decrease the risk for aspiration, choking and other complications associated with dysphagia | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |