Drawing for HAWAIIAN INVITATIONAL "INTERNATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL"

USPTO serial 76576879

HAWAIIAN INVITATIONAL "INTERNATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAWAIIAN INVITATIONAL "INTERNATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanford Astor

Sanford Astor Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP221 North Figueroa StreetSuite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Arranging travel packages for musical groupsACTIVEAug 1, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 21, 2008GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2007PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Aug 10, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 20, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance