USPTO serial 76576977
DART PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DART PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Elk Grove, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Happ Controls 7-Pin Tumbler Locks Happ Controls All-Purpose Cleaner Happ Controls Aspen Elite LED Flash;ight Happ Controls Cleaning Cards Happ Controls Coil Cleaner Happ Controls Coin Counter Happ Controls Coin Doors Happ' Controls Coin Mechanisms Happ Controls Commodity Trough Cleaner Happ Controls Driving Controls Happ Controls Enviro-Duster Happ Controls E-Z Vend Wax And Oil Remover Happ Controls Glass Cleaner Happ Controls Guardian Hasps Happ Controls Joysticks Happ Controls Lock Department Happ Controls Maple Pro Cue Stick Happ Controls Meters Happ Controls Optical Guns Happ Controls Power Pro Power Supplies Happ Controls Puck Lock Happ Controls Pushbuttons Happ Controls Repair Center Happ Controls Screwdriver Happ Controls Spray Adhesive Happ Controls Spray Paint Happ Controls Stainless Steel Cleaner Happ Controls Ticket Dispenser Happ Controls Vandal Mark Remover Happ Controls Vision Pro Monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |