USPTO serial 76577000
BEVELINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEVELINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, N21 3BJ, GB
London, N21 3BJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily A. Shouse
EMILY A SHOUSE WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, namely, olives, sun dried tomatoes, peeled tomatoes, tomato paste, passata, namely, tomato puree, stuffed vegetables, char-grilled vegetables, grilled vegetables, tapenades, vegetable pastes; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats, namely, olive oil, vegetable oil; tinned foods, namely, canned peas, canned beans, canned lentils, canned vegetables; pickles | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, pasta; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, cookies, fruit jellies, frozen confections, bakery desserts, biscuits, muffins, Danish pastries, cakes, cupcakes, cinnamon buns, buns, rolls, bread sticks, bagels, crackers, pies, ready to eat cereal derived food bars and cereal based snack food; ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, namely, wine vinegar, and balsamic vinegar; sauces, namely, pasta sauces, and pesto sauces; spices; ice | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, mineral water; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making fruit drinks, lemon flavored drinks; and other preparations for making beverages, namely concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |