Drawing for B BUTTERFIELD BLOOMS

USPTO serial 76577052

B BUTTERFIELD BLOOMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B BUTTERFIELD BLOOMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

ATTN SCOTT J MAJOR MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring flowers and related items and giftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 29, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 1, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 9, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 30, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Nov 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 28, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance