USPTO serial 76577054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Filtering material made from biodegradable plastic fiber; padding and stuffing materials made of biodegradable plastic; film not for wrapping made from biodegradable plastic for civil engineering or construction; non-conducting materials for retaining heat, namely, heat and acoustical composite insulating shield; insulating materials, namely, three dimensional structured non-woven fabrics made of biodegradable plastic fiber; soundproofing materials for building and machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Apron, bandana, bath robes, bath sandals, bathing caps, beachwear, beach shoes, baby bibs not for paper, boots, brassieres, camisoles, caps, shower caps, clothing for gymnastics, namely, coats, shirts, jackets; girdles, gloves, hats, heels, inner soles, jacket, jerseys, jumpers, knitwear, namely, sweaters; layettes, liveries, neckties, pajama, pants, paper clothing, namely, underwear; sandals, scarves, shawls, shirts, skirts, slippers, socks, soles for footwear, sports shoes, stocking, suits, panty hoses, sweaters, swim suits, tee-shirts, tights, under wear, uniforms, vest | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |