Drawing for SMART VEGGIE

USPTO serial 76577164

SMART VEGGIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART VEGGIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Bikus

Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP1620 Dodge StreetSuite 2100Omaha, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029vegetable based meat substitutes and frozen entrees containing vegetable based meat substitutesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 23, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance