Drawing for PRIMA-CARE

USPTO serial 76577262

PRIMA-CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMA-CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024cloth gauzeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 20, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 10, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 12, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 24, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance