USPTO serial 76577273
ECO-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bob Delbridge
BOB DELBRIDGE GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPPO BOX 1045, LCD 1HAMILTON, ON L8N 3R4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Machine dishwashing chemicals, namely detergents, rinse additives, sanitizers; automatic dishwashing machines, manual chemical dispensing devices, automatic chemical dispensing devices, dishracks, proportioners for mixing water and chemicals, mixers and tanks for mixing water and chemicals; manual dishwashing chemicals, namely detergents, sanitizers; kitchen cleaning chemicals, namely pot and pan detergent, all purpose surface cleaners, degreasers, descalers, sanitizers, disinfectants, stainless steel polishes, warewash soaking preparations for flatware and dishes; oven cleaners, fryer cleaners; grill cleansers; drain maintenance preparations, namely drain openers, drain deodorizers, enzymatic drain maintainers; housekeeping preparations, namely floor care preparations, cleaners, strippers, sealers and finishes; soap dispensers and hand washing preparations; general purpose cleaners, sanitizers; restroom care preparations, namely bowl cleaners, tile cleaners, sanitizers, disinfectants, enzymatic cleaners and deodorizers; restroom care products, namely room deodorizing equipment and fragrance preparations, manual cleaning dispensing devices, automatic chemical dispensing devices, proportioners; laundry preparations, namely detergents, breaks, bleach, softeners, sours, bacteriostats, antichlors, pre-spotters; laundry products, namely manual chemical dispensing devices, automatic chemical dispensing devices, proportioners; industrial cleaning preparations, namely degreasers, general purpose cleaners, paint strippers, aircraft cleaners, soap dispensers and hand cleaning and hand washing preparations, hand protective creams, rust inhibitors, auto wash preparations, steam and pressure wash cleaners, rust and scale removers, safety solvent cleaners; carpet care preparations, namely cleaners, deodorizers, protectant, pre-spray; alkaline, acidic, chlorinated, sanitizing cleaners for food manufacturing areas; paper products, including bathroom tissue, paper towels, napkins and dispensers therefor; garbage bags and liners therefor; wipes and microfibre cloths; vacuum cleaners and filters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |