Drawing for DR. JESSICA WU SKINCARE

USPTO serial 76577519

DR. JESSICA WU SKINCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. JESSICA WU SKINCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine M. McCauley

CATHERINE M MCCAULEY LAW OFFICE OF CATHERINE M MCCAULEYP O BOX 500CASTLETON, VT 05735-0500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; hair care preparations, namely shampoo, conditioner, moisturizer, hair mist, and hair spray; and non-medicated skin care preparations, namely body lotion, lip balm, skin powder, skin wipes, skin masks, sunscreen, moisturizer, eye cream, heel cream, skin cleansers, face cream, hand cream, and skin creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance