USPTO serial 76577624
BOGARDUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOGARDUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Rubber balls; action figures and accessories therefor; ability and action games, namely action target games; bean bag dolls; stuffed toys; balloons; toy golf accessories, namely, toy golf balls, toy golf gloves and toy golf ball tees; toy tennis balls; bathtub toys; Christmas tree decorations; board games; toy building blocks; equipment sold as a unit for card games; dolls and doll clothes; doll accessories; toy cosmetics for children; crib toys;electric action toys; action skill games; puzzles; kites; toy mobiles; music box toys; party favors in the form of small toys; inflatable pool toys; mechanical and battery-operated multi-action toys; jump ropes; target games; disc-type toss toys; bow and arrow toys; toy vehicles; toy cars; toy trucks; toy pail and shovel sets; roller skates; toy model hobbycraft kits; toy rockets; toy guns; toy holsters; musical toys; toy badminton sets; bubble-blowing wands and solution sets; modeled plastic toy figurines; toy banks; puppets; yo-yos; skateboards; toy scooters; toy face masks; hand held unit for playing electronic games; and playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |